Durgical
EN
Open the app

Forest plot

  • Concept

A forest plot shows each study as a square with its interval, and the pooled effect as a diamond, against the line of no effect.

Updated

What it is

The forest plot summarises a meta-analysis. Each row is a study: the square marks its effect and its size shows the weight; the horizontal line is its confidence interval. The diamond at the bottom is the pooled effect: its centre is the estimate and its width the CI. The vertical line of no effect sits at 1 for ratios (RR, OR, HR) and at 0 for differences.

Worked example

  1. Data (made up): 4 trials of a falls-prevention programme; RR (95 % CI): 0.70 (0.50–0.98); 0.85 (0.60–1.20); 0.60 (0.40–0.90); 1.05 (0.70–1.58).
  2. Trials 1 and 3: their CI lies entirely below 1: a significant reduction in each.
  3. Trials 2 and 4: their CI crosses 1: on their own they show no difference.
  4. Inverse-variance weights on the log scale: ≈ 30 %, 28 %, 21 % and 21 %: the first two, with narrower CIs, weigh more.
  5. Diamond (fixed effect): RR 0.78 (95 % CI 0.65 to 0.94); it does not touch the line at 1.
  6. Relative reduction: 1 − 0.78 = 0.22, that is, 22 % fewer falls.
  7. Reading: two inconclusive trials do not cancel the set; combined, the 4 show a benefit with a CI that excludes 1.

Markers

  • Square
  • CI
  • Diamond
  • Line of no effect
  • I²

In practice

  • Look first at the diamond and the line of no effect, then at the spread of the squares: if they line up, the result is consistent.
  • A narrow diamond close to 1 can be significant yet clinically small: translate it into an absolute effect.

Common pitfalls

  • Vote counting (2 positive and 2 negative, so we do not know): meta-analysis weighs and combines, it does not count.
  • Reading the wrong side of the axis as favouring the intervention.
  • Forgetting that the ratio axis is logarithmic: 0.5 and 2 are the same distance from 1.

Test yourself

Think of the answer, then tap the question to see it.

What does the size of each study's square in a forest plot show?

The study's weight in the meta-analysis, which depends mainly on its precision (sample size and number of events).

Where is the line of no effect for a relative risk and for a mean difference?

At 1 for the relative risk (and other ratios) and at 0 for a mean difference.

The diamond of an RR forest plot runs from 0.65 to 0.94. What does it mean?

That the pooled effect is a statistically significant reduction: the whole CI lies below 1.

Add to my cards (3)

Connections

← All of epidemiology

Educational content on epidemiological and statistical methods; the examples use made-up numbers to teach the calculation. Not a clinical or legal guide: current Colombian rules are in the official sources.

Sources: Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses (Cochrane, 2026).

Spotted a mistake?We are always improving for the community. Tell us what is wrong and our team will review it.Report a mistake

Representative model, for educational purposes only.