Durgical
EN
Open the app

The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights

  • International document

In 2005 UNESCO adopted 15 principles of bioethics addressed to States, linking medical ethics with human rights and social justice.

Updated

What it is

The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights was adopted by the UNESCO General Conference on 19 October 2005 in Paris. It is addressed to States, although it also guides individuals, communities, institutions and corporations. It goes beyond the four classic principles: besides dignity, benefit, autonomy and consent, it includes vulnerability, privacy, equality and equity, non-discrimination, cultural diversity, solidarity, social responsibility and health, sharing of benefits, future generations and the environment. That is why it is widely cited in Latin America, where bioethics is also thought of in terms of poverty and access to health care. It is not a treaty: it is not legally binding, but it carries weight as a commitment by States.

Key points

  • Art. 1: it addresses the ethical issues of medicine, the life sciences and associated technologies applied to human beings, in their social, legal and environmental dimensions.
  • Art. 6: any preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic medical intervention requires the person's prior, free and informed consent, which may be withdrawn at any time.
  • Art. 7: those who cannot consent receive special protection; they take part in the decision as far as possible, and their refusal to take part in research is respected.
  • Art. 8: human vulnerability is taken into account when applying science; especially vulnerable groups are protected.
  • Art. 12: cultural diversity is respected, but never to infringe dignity, human rights or the other principles.
  • Art. 20: calls for assessing and managing the risks of medicine and the life sciences.

Historical context

  • It is UNESCO's first text to treat bioethics as a whole; earlier there were two declarations on genetics (1997 on the human genome and 2003 on genetic data).
  • It was drafted through consultations with States and experts from different regions, which is why it includes social and environmental issues that US principlism did not stress.
  • In Latin America it is used to support a bioethics committed to justice and access to health care.

The principles of the Declaration (arts. 3 to 17)

ArticlePrinciple
3Human dignity and human rights
4Benefit and harm
5Autonomy and individual responsibility
6Consent
7Persons without the capacity to consent
8Respect for human vulnerability and personal integrity
9Privacy and confidentiality
10Equality, justice and equity
11Non-discrimination and non-stigmatization
12Respect for cultural diversity and pluralism
13Solidarity and cooperation
14Social responsibility and health
15Sharing of benefits
16Protecting future generations
17Protection of the environment, the biosphere and biodiversity

Today

  • Research in Indigenous communities: the permission of the leader or the assembly is useful, but each participant must consent (art. 6).
  • A study that benefits only its sponsor and leaves nothing for the population studied conflicts with art. 15 (sharing of benefits).
  • Unequal access to essential medicines is a bioethical problem, not only an economic one (art. 14).
  • The ethics committees the declaration calls for must be independent and pluralist (art. 19).

Revisions and official text

  • Adopted on 19 October 2005 by the UNESCO General Conference; no later revisions. Text checked on 2026-11-13 at unesco.org.
  • It is a declaration, not a treaty: it needs no ratification and cannot be enforced before a judge, although it guides member States, Colombia among them.
  • Related UNESCO texts: Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (1997) and International Declaration on Human Genetic Data (2003).

Test yourself

Think of the answer, then tap the question to see it.

Which body adopted the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, and when?

The UNESCO General Conference, on 19 October 2005, in Paris.

To whom is the 2005 UNESCO Declaration addressed?

To States (art. 1), although it also guides the decisions and practices of individuals, communities, institutions and public and private corporations.

What does art. 3 say about the interest of science and society?

That the interests and welfare of the individual have priority over the sole interest of science or society.

Can a community agreement replace individual consent under the Declaration?

No. Art. 6 says that neither a collective agreement nor the consent of a community leader replaces the person's informed consent.

Add to my cards (4)

Connections

← All of medical ethics

Educational content on ethics and health law; not legal advice. Laws and case law change: each page links the official text and says when it was last checked. For a real case, read the text in force and ask a lawyer or the medical ethics tribunal.

Sources: Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UNESCO, 2005); International Declaration on Human Genetic Data (UNESCO, 2003).

Spotted a mistake?We are always improving for the community. Tell us what is wrong and our team will review it.Report a mistake

Representative model, for educational purposes only.